The curse of education industry

This is not the first time I get hit by the (quite common) stereotypes about the Education industry. And I can't say I was not warned - quite the opposite, just before I got the job at the Uni I was told that it does not count towards commercial experience. But at that time I was quite sick of the corporate environment - a lot of rudeness, shallow jokes, tasteless parties, etc. I was hoping to find a better medium at the academic circles (and better pay, of course). At first it actually was so.

Now, having spent over 15 years at the Uni, I am sick of bureaucracy and fake smiles, budget cuts and wasteful spending. It's time to get the new job and I have prepared the CVs and cover letters, and am ready to dive in to the sea of unknown.

I tried this (not very thoroughly) earlier last year. I did not succeed despite receiving invitations for an interview on both occasions I applied. This year I was hoping for the similar result. Surprise: nothing, not even a click on my blog I started for this occasion. Looks like the myths about educational industry still prevail the minds of my potential employees.

Myth 1 - deadlines are not met and standards are low at Uni

Funny enough, there are thousands of students come through the University each year, and every time in the beginning of semester it's a mad house: last minute orders to install software on dozens of computers. Last minute rearrangement of lab layout. Unprovoked network port block by the central ITS. And so on. Guess who should fix all of the above before the first lab? So I do. And I succeed. It's true that many times the decisions are made quite late and there is physically not enough time to implement most of them. But it is also true that the students come next day to the fully functional computers and equipment. So the myth is not quite right about the people who actually do the work.

Myth 2 - Uni people are not skilled enough and their products are of low quality

Imagine an Uni tech, working on huge variety of subjects, from AV integration to CNC programming. The tasks change daily, there are always a new skill to learn - not to the perfection, but enough to make things running. In complex systems - and University is one of those - it is much more important to maintain the stable operational flow than to fine tune individual processes. At some stage after dealing enough with certain issue the skill level gets relatively high and the quality improves accordingly. So it is quite untrue that University means low quality experience. Rather it means broad skill set and ability to learn on the fly.

Myth 3 - Uni people tend to do everything perfect and thus it takes forever to do anything

The opposite to the previous point (and sometimes mindlessly quoted one after another) also does not bear the truth. While every one should thrive for perfection, in real world common sense rules that "good plan today is better then the perfect one tomorrow". Considering how many times I had to streamline some jobs due to late notice/urgent requests, the question of slowness is rather theoretical and based on stereotypes.

Climbing up the corporate ladder

Climbing up the corporate ladder - does it worth the effort?

Abstract

I am going to highlight some features related to the career growth and promotion. Some things are obvious and need no explanation. Other are quite subtle and not many people either notice or speak openly about those. This post is short and is only intended to warn others of the possible pitfalls while they are at the beginning of their career.

Small to medium organization

Basically there are two types of small organizations: where it is possible to grow and where it is not. Some very small firms are so fixated on their survival so there is not much room left to expand and progress. But once the company starts to make some profit due to the nature of capitalism it will want to grow.

Starting at the very bottom it is possible to climb up a few rungs. Usually this is achieved by adhering to higher then normal workload and active involvement in company's projects. If your contribution has benefited the company and your efforts were noticed by the right people you have a very good chance for promotion. Your growth at this stage is related to the business growth.

Each stage will require different skills. As you improve your current talents and acquire new skills you have most of the opportunity to get a little bit higher. Eventually if you reached the desired position in the company but you want to move higher, you will start gazing at the larger pool of opportunities.

Large or government organization

In the large organization it is still possible to get a promotion, but it gets much harder towards equivalent of middle management. At some stage the organization is no longer operating in a predictable manner. What seemed logical at a very low level or at a small business described above does not work well (or not at all) at the big firm.

Hard work and personal initiative now are not the most important characteristics the management will look for in the potential candidate for promotion. Here comes something out of middle ages: loyalty and obedience. If you do everything your manager tells you, even if it seems stupid and absurd, you will get their appreciation. If you try to do something on your own, this is a signal that you are either too smart (and therefore too stupid), or too dangerous. In the best case scenario you will get ignored (even without formal thank you). In the worst case you will get ignored profusely to the point of pushing you out of the job.

To understand the psychology behind such behavior you need to understand how the higher ups got to their positions. When there are several candidates for the same role and there are no distinct professional criteria specified for that role, the one with better connections will win. Simple as that. At the top it does not matter anymore what you can do and what do you know. But who do you know and who knows you becomes very important.

But this is not a complete picture yet. The people at the top are also competing with each other. And if your boss is not successful at getting his own promotion, most likely you will not get yours. At that level the stakes are so high the people start to employ more and more ruthless methods of removing their rivals from the race. You can guess what kind of people most likely to get to the top.

Is it worth to struggle to get to the top? I guess everyone will decide on what kind of top is most suitable for them. My top (and full stop) starts where my dignity and self respect get ignored. This is the moment I start looking for another job.